The closed Saks card was just one of Tameka Raymond's many grievances in her ongoing custody fight against Usher -- and now, the court has taken her side ... holding the singer in contempt for pulling the plug on her fancy charge account.
Tameka claims she needs the account to do her job as a stylist.
As for the other grievances -- Tameka said Usher owed her cash for the nanny bill ... and continually failed to keep her in the loop about where and when he traveled with the kids.
The court agreed ... and awarded Tameka $1,300 for the nanny.
The judge has yet to determine the ex-couple's custody and support issues.
If she needs the account for her job as a stylist, then she should apply for it on her own!! Whose stylist is she anyway??
ReplyDeleteWasn't she a "stylist" before she married Usher? I just don't understand why Usher has to be responsible for her hustle, especially since she was doing it before they were married. And, sooooo, he has to pay her child support AND the nanny bill? I mean, I'm quite sure his monthly child support paymenst is MORE than enough to foot the nanny bill and anything else she's got going on.
ReplyDeleteThat's part of the divorce settlement. Either you hand her millions, or you negotiate to pay some monthly bills. Trust, he came off easier this way. He'd rather let her have a monthly budget of Neiman ensembles than to put cash in her hands.
DeleteAdditionally, the agreement was for her to be able to keep the card, SHE makes the payments and the judge found no evidence that she wasn't making payments, or abusing the card.
DeleteThat judge need a kick in the a$$.
ReplyDeleteHere we go again.Ima tell u Im a Ursher fan. Yall dont know whats going on.When i got divorced every1 thought my ex was so nice. He took all the money out the bank, and when i asked 4 money to feed our kids he told me to wait on it. So Tameka girl get your self a good lawyer and try and get your kids futures set up right.
ReplyDeleteI believe Ursher will make sure his two are set for life. The other two are not his responsibility. He should have to pay half the nanny bill. Ex-wife should pay the other half. I read somewhere that tameka owned a daycare or two, plus she is a stylist and receives child support for the two boys she has with Ursher. The other two havre a daddy, one of them is over 18 but the other should be getting child support from his dad Still. Tameka is by no means hurting if she use her money wisely. Her money can work for her. We already know Usher is cheap,selfish, and a Chester. Move on and stop being Angry ! It doesn't make things better.
ReplyDelete