When the policy takes effect Oct. 1, the Michigan Department of Human Services will keep up with kids ages six to 15 who will have to prove they are enrolled in school. If kids within that age range miss more than ten days of class, their parents can lose their welfare benefits.
It is a policy move that one welfare recipient feels is outright wrong. “I think it’s very unfair, and I think it’s very stupid. I mean, it doesn’t make sense,” said Ebony Boost (pictured above), who has three children and is currently on welfare.
Maybe they have household problems, the parents. There might be something going on in the home, but I think they just need to investigate that further,” Boost remarked
The state, however, believes that the rule will help bolster school enrollment.
“Our whole goal is that we’re going to increase academic success for children,” said Sheryl Thompson with the Department of Human Services. “We’re going to have higher graduation rates because the most important thing with this also is that we want to end generational poverty and it starts by increasing our educational values.”
Fox 2 News Detroit has more on this story:
Maureen Taylor, head of the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization, believes the plan unfairly targets low income families since they are not the only ones who aren’t going to school.The state plans to work with families and says that they can get their benefits back if they can prove their children have been back to school for 21 consecutive days.
“What kind of plan is this? Let’s punish everybody. Because this kid may have missed some days of school, maybe we should find out why that kid missed school,” she said. “I like motivation, but the motivation here is to take away breakfast, lunch and dinner.”
The policy change takes effect two days before Michigan’s fall count day when attendance is used to determine the funding a school district gets from the state. There are plenty in favor of the new plan like Ryan Battle, who said there is no excuse why a parent shouldn’t be sending their kid to school.
“It matters. I mean, if you’re not going to school, if you’re not doing what you’re supposed to do with your kids, then how is the future going to work? You can’t raise new presidents if you don’t go to school,” he said.

Good and when they start drug testing their asses (government assistance recipients) even better!
ReplyDeleteYea there might be problems with the kids but if you expect to keep your benefits you need to exhaust every method to remedy their problem. Since they're on welfare they probably qualify for other programs to evaluate their own family issues or the child's issue as to why they aren't going to class. People go on and on about how the teachers are at fault but if the kids are not prepared by their parents to go to school and learn then what are the teachers supposed to do with kids that don't want to learn.
ReplyDeleteWithout a doubt they have good intentions but this rule will end up hurting the ones who need the help the most. Let look for a better way to motivate attendance.
ReplyDeleteYEA I TOTALLY AGREE .THESE WOMEN NEED TO MAKE SURE THE KIDS GO TO SCHOOL. IF A KID WANTS TO EAT GET UP AND GO TO SCHOOL.THEY ARE GIVING THEM SOME SICK DAYS OTHER THAN THAT THEIR IS NO EXCUSE.THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO STEP UP AND START DRUG TESTING THESE FOLKS ALSO.
ReplyDeleteThey should half of the parents on welfare sit at home not going to school themselves and half of them do not want to get up in the morning to make sure their children eat and go to school on time.
ReplyDeletethe worst is yet to come
ReplyDeletepost hobama's 2nd selection in 2012...
bet
draconian nwo laws will worsen for us all
cc ndaa
nobama 2012!!!
http://aliciabanks.xanga.com/758055237/happy-2012/
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=FL2OFfSyqFMfqIPU_BexopXg&feature=plcp
ReplyDelete